Архитектура Аудит Военная наука Иностранные языки Медицина Металлургия Метрология
Образование Политология Производство Психология Стандартизация Технологии


Liberalism: From the Liberal Tradition to the Neo-Neo Debates



 

Required:

Chapter 7: “Liberalism” in Baylis, Smith and Owens (eds) pp. 113-125

Burchill, Scott (2005) “Liberalism”, in Burchill et al. pp 55-81. 

Lamy, Steven (2014) Chapter 8: “Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism” in Baylis, Smith and Owens (eds) pp. 126-140

Recommended:

Nye, Joseph (1992). “Neorealism and Neoliberalism”, World Politics 35, 1992.

Jervis, Robert “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate”, International Security, Summer 1999, Vol. 24, No. 1, Pages 42-63

 

 

9. Liberalism 2 – Three Pillars of Liberalism

Required:

Doyle, Michael W. (2005) "Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace." American Political Science Review 99.3 (2005): 463-466

Deudney, D. and G. J. Ikenberry (1999) “The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order” Review of International Studies 25(2): 179–96.

Erik Gartzke. (2007). “The Capitalist Peace”. , American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 51, No. 1: 166–91.

Recommended:

Chan, Steve (1997). “In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise”,Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 41, No. 1: 59-91.

Rosato, Sebastian. (2003) “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 4: 585-602

Copeland, Dale. (1996) "Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations," International Security 4: 5-41,

 

The English School

 

Required:

Armstrong, David (2014) Chapter 2: “The Evolution of International Society” in Baylis, Smith and Owens. pp. 36-49

Linklater, Andrew (2005) Chapter 4: “The English School” in Burchill et. al. .pp 84-109.

Recommended:

Brown, Chris (1995). �International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the

Middle Way’, Review of International Studies 21(2) pp.183–96.

Hall, Ian (2012). �Taming the Anarchical Society’, E-International Relations, July 5, available here: http://www.e-ir.info/2012/07/05/taming-the-the-anarchical-society/ 

Hoffman, Stanley (1986). �Hedley Bull and His Contribution to International Relations’ International Affairs, Vol. 62, No. 2. pp. 179 – 195

Little, Richard D (2003). �The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language?’ Review of International Studies 29 (3) pp. 443 – 460.

Suganami, Hidemi (2010). �The English School in a Nutshell’, Annual Review of International Studies, Vol.9 pp. 15–28.

Suganami, Hidemi (2017). �The Argument of The Anarchical Society’ in Hidemi Suganami, Madeline Carr and Adam Humphreys (eds.) The Anarchical Society at 40: Contemporary Challenges and Prospects. Oxford University Press. pp 23–40.

Constructivism

Required:

Reus-Smit, Christian (2005) Chapter 8: “Constructivism” in Burchill et. al. pp 188-212.

Weber, Cynthia (2010). International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction (3rd edition). Routledge. �Constructivism: Is Anarchy What States Make of It?’ pp. 61�82.

Wendt, Alexander (1992). �Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,’ International Organization, 46, Spring 1992. pp. 391 – 425.

Recommended:

Adler, Emanuel (1997). �Seizing the Middle Ground’, European Journal of International Relations 3, pp.319–64.

Adler, Emanuel (2013). �Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions, and Debates’ in: Walter E. Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, Beth A Simmons (eds.). Handbook of International Relations (2nd ed.), Sage. pp. 112 – 144.

Barnett, Michael (2014) Chapter 10: “Social constructivism” in Baylis, Smith and Owens. pp. 155-168

Copeland, Dale (2000). �The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay’. International Security, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 187–212

Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink (1998). �International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52, no.4, pp. 887 – 917.

Rengger, N. (2000). International Relations, Political Theory and The Problem of Order. Routledge. “Society” Chapter.

Wendt, Alexander (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. �Three Cultures of Anarchy’. pp. 264 – 312.

 

Marxism

Required:

Chapter 9: “Marxist Theories of International Relations” in Baylis, Smith and Owens (eds) pp. 141-154

Linklaer, Andrew (2005) “Marxism”, in Burchill et.al. pp: 110-136.

Wallerstein, Immanuel (2011) Chapter 5: “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis”, in The Essential Wallerstein

Recommended:

Frank, A. G. (1966) �The Development of Underdevelopment’, Monthly Review 18(4): 17–31

McKelvey, Charles (2018). The Evolution and Significance of the Cuban Revolution Palgrave. В Chapter 1: Global and Historical Context.

Ho-Fung, H. (2009). “China: America's Head Servant?”. New Left Review, No 60,

 

Part 4 –Critiques of Mainstream IR


Поделиться:



Последнее изменение этой страницы: 2019-03-22; Просмотров: 302; Нарушение авторского права страницы


lektsia.com 2007 - 2024 год. Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав! (0.008 с.)
Главная | Случайная страница | Обратная связь