Архитектура Аудит Военная наука Иностранные языки Медицина Металлургия Метрология Образование Политология Производство Психология Стандартизация Технологии |
The following are samples taken from the literature to show various skills some operators have achieved.
They illustrate clearly the automatic, subconscious nature of real skill in telegraphy that it is a habitual form of behavior, done without conscious intervention or effort. They also show what can be done by what has been done. People who do things well do not struggle with them: they enjoy doing them. It can be seen that there is a hierarchy of skill habits, ranging from lower degrees to very high degrees of skill, each step leading to greater freedom of action than before.
Receiving Code While Doing Something Else
Sending and writing at the same time:
Sending and receiving simultaneously:
Receiving two or more messages at same time:
A former Navy operator claimed that while copying one message, he often could mentally note other messages which were interfering with the reception of the one he was copying, and do so accurately enough to write them out later. He said that, especially when he was copying some particularly dull and uninteresting material, he was always fully conscious of the content of messages heard at the same time on adjacent frequencies concerning shore leave, pay or other interesting aspects of these transmissions.
One expert operator in San Francisco is credited with having received three separate dispatches at the same time, writing each of them out correctly by memory afterward. That looks a little hard! Using both American Morse and Morse International codes simultaneously: - Robert (Dick) Johnstone of old KPH was a phenomenal operator, said to be one of the best of his day. He could send one message in International Morse while simultaneously sending another with his other hand in American Morse. Similar claims have been made by others also.
Comparison with other mental functions and discussion
Doing two things at once, one subconscious or automatic and the other conscious is relatively commonplace. For example, I can read aloud from printed matter while consciously thinking about something quite different, and still read so that it sounds meaningful -- yet afterwards have little or no recollection of what I had read aloud (and sometimes wondering if I had included anything of what I had been thinking at any point along the line.
As for the operators who could copy two messages simultaneously, is it possible that both actions were automatic? Were they hearing one with the right ear and writing it down with the left hand, while hearing the other effectively with the left ear and writing it with the right hand, or what? Or, was the one automatic and the other conscious, although done at fairly high speed? If both were automatic, were they free to think of or hear something still different at the same time? This seems possible from the experience of a few who have said that they were attending to two messages and yet hearing salient points of still a third, or voices in their environment. Or, is this something like the "sandwich" operation of a large computer where each of several different people seems to be doing his job as the only one in control, yet the computer is apparently handling them simultaneously. Actually the computer does this by dividing the jobs into parts which are scheduled and processed in an interwoven manner by a schema for optimum usage of computer functions, time-slicing and controlling to keep each one separate, and only seeming to give each operator sole control. For a human example, how does the traffic control officer of an airport keep alert to the arrival and departure of many aircraft all at the same time, seeming to give each "simultaneous" attention? Very interesting, isn't it?
Speeds
Jim Farrior W4FOK wrote this way: - "When I was a boy of 13 I lived in a small town in AL. The RR telegraph office was one of the few things in town that interested me. One of the three agent telegraphers gave me his sounder and telegraph key. The night agent usually had little work to do and often helped me by sending to me and telling me about operating procedures, etc. The sounder there was nearly always active, and I gradually became able to copy directly from the wire. I guess I learned it pretty much like one learns to speak, because I don't remember trying to learn. I was told that it was really very easy, and I guess I believed it. I was just having fun, and dreamed that some day I might become a telegrapher."
Some Interesting Examples Of Young Skilled Operators Of The Past
Those youngsters were motivated and quick to learn. When the Civil War began he volunteered along with many others, became their youngest operator, and by early 1862 was already the assistant operator at the important military station of Ft. Monroe, VA, and considered an expert. When the Commander, General Wool, first saw him he was astounded. On a subsequent military assignment at Norfolk, VA, on one occasion John scrawled down two incoming messages while he was actually asleep, writing them down in a book he had been reading. (Civil War operators often worked impossibly long hours under difficult or dangerous battlefront conditions, and when things let up a bit, easily dropped off for a few winks of sleep.)
James H. Bunnell became an operator at age 13. He was so short that he had to sit on a stool to reach the telegraph instruments. At age 16 he was one of the best operators in the country, noted for his speed of 38 wpm (by actual word count). These are just two examples of the many, many boys who quickly became skilled telegraphers in the mid-1800's.
EXAMPLES OF EFFECTIVE CODE LEARNING Then consider these higher skill levels: In 1909-1910 Don C. Wallace learned the code with a friend, John Cook, and the help of the operators of Commercial station PJ in San Pedro CA. In 1910 he set up his first station. In 1915 he passed the test for a first class commercial operator's license, said to have required demonstrating ability to handle 25 wpm in Continental code and 30 wpm in American Morse code. Later with Tony Gerhardt he played a game they called "burnout." One would send as fast as he could with speed key (bug) while the other copied on a typewriter, the idea being to see who could go the faster. This continued wherever they were until Don could send in excess of 45 wpm and receive about 55 wpm
Later he needed a staff of 35 assistant operators of about his own speed capabilities. Within a short time he found them among Navy personnel where he was stationed, and did it this way: by sending his requests at these speeds and seeing who responded to what he sent. Here were at least three dozen men with high-speed skills before 1920. They were men who enjoyed the code so much they achieved high goals. Moral: If you want to do it, you probably can.
Arnie's Father was chief telegraph operator at a RR station and had once won a 60-wpm award in a contest for RR operators. His son, age 8, Arnie hung around the station all his spare time. He didn't say how, but he learned Morse on his own and soon had learned to send and receive at about 25 wpm. When dad was out he copied down the train orders for him. He wanted a job as operator. After much pleading, his dad said he could operate the station all by himself when he reached his 9th birthday. So he did, all day, while his dad looked over his shoulder and smiled a time or two. Arnie begged the RR to let him be a second shift operator after school and weekends for 50 cents an hour as second shift operator. He was required to pass the cooked-up special qualifying test: of sending a train order at 25 wpm using one key with his left hand for the dashes and a second key with his right hand for the dots. He succeeded in doing it some months later, and finally was given a job as sole operator on second shift all summer. Appendix Sources of Material
|
Последнее изменение этой страницы: 2019-04-19; Просмотров: 207; Нарушение авторского права страницы