Criteria for evaluation oral (written) survey

№	Criteria for evaluation	Level
Perfekt	Acceptable	Requires correction	Unaccept ble
1.	Level of understanding of the topic		11.25	7, 5
2.	The ability to think logically		11, 25	7, 5
3.	Match of the material issues raised
4.	Availability to answer all the necessary theoretical facts		7, 5	5, 0
5.	Illustration answer correctly-chosen examples		7, 5	5, 0
6.	Culture of Speech		7, 5	5, 0
7.	Possession of professional terminology		7, 5	5, 0
8.	Ability to make valid conclusions		7, 5	5, 0
	Total

Total maximum score - 100

CHECKLISTS

First name and surname of the student _____________________________________

Criteria for evaluation communication skills of the student

№	Criteria for evaluation	Level
Perfekt	Acceptable	Requires correction	Unaccept ble
1.	Skill self-representation		11, 25	7, 5
2.	Active listening skills		11, 25	7, 5
3.	Skill accurate and specific information transfer		11, 25	7, 5
4.	Skill to express their point of view, its position		11, 25	7, 5
5.	Skill reasoned speech		11, 25	7, 5
6.	Skill manifestations of participation and interest in the partner		7, 5
7.	Skill of understanding the emotional state of the communication partner	7, 5	5, 62	3, 75
8.	Skill beliefs partner	7, 5	5, 62	3, 75
	Total

Total maximum score - 100

CHECKLISTS

First name and surname of the student _____________________________________

Criteria for evaluation the presentation in multimedia format

№	Criteria for evaluation	Level
Perfekt	Acceptable	Requires correction	Unacceptable
1.	Any title slide with the headline, plan presentation, a sufficient number of slides, list of references and sources of Internet.		7, 5
2.	The contents of the presentation of the topic and the task.		7, 5
3.	Location slides in a logical sequence.		7, 5
4.	The style of presentation (conciseness, clear formulation, structuring).		7, 5
5.	The use of modern information sources in sufficient quantities.		7, 5
6.	Ability to generalize the material, clear and precise conclusions.		7, 5
7.	Level of orientation in the material presentation.		7, 5
8.	The ability to report accurately, correctly, consistently.		7, 5
9.	Ability to defend its position and the ability to respond constructively to criticism.		7, 5
10.	Quality design slides (brilliance, clarity, etc.).		7, 5
	Total

Total maximum score - 100

CHECKLISTS

First name and surname of the student _____________________________________

Criteria for evaluation of the abstract

№	Criteria for evaluation	Level
Perfekt	Acceptable	Requires correction	Unaccept ble
1.	The contents of the essay topic, essay plan and assigned tasks		9, 75	6, 5
2.	Completeness and consistency of disclosure topics		9, 75	6, 5
3.	Ability to summarize and draw conclusions		9, 75	6, 5
4.	The ability to work with sources of information		9, 75	6, 5
5.	Ability to respond to questions on the abstract
6.	Compliance with the requirements of the Department of the abstract design.
7.	The quality and completeness of the illustrations.
8.	Selection of literature
	Total

Total maximum score - 100

CHECKLISTS

First name and surname of the student _____________________________________

Criteria for assessment of the thematic crossword

№	Criteria for evaluation	Level
Perfekt	Acceptable	Requires correction	Unaccept ble
1.	The contents of the selected theme crossword
2.	Literacy, conciseness in drafting issues
3.	The number of questions in a crossword.
4.	Having a list of references
5.	Aesthetically sustained clearance
	Total

 

Total maximum score - 100

CHECKLISTS

First name and surname of the student _____________________________________

Criteria for evaluation situational problem, a case study

№	Criteria for evaluation	Level
Perfekt	Acceptable	Requires correction	Unaccept ble
1.	Number of questions to which the student replied
2.	Completeness and consistency of disclosure of the issue of the problem
3.	Independent selection of literature
4.	Ability to work with sources of information - the standard documentation
5.	Ability to summarize and draw conclusions
	Total

 

Total maximum score - 100

Conclusion control: integrated examination, consist of 2 approaches: 1) testing, 2) orally form (by tickets, verification of practical skills and etc.)

E= E₁x0.2 E₂x0.2

that Е_{1 -} points after I the stage of examination,

Е_{2 –} points after II the stage of examination.

A final estimation consists of rating of admittance and estimation of final control:

I = R х 0, 6 E х 0, 4,

that

I – final mark

R– estimation of rating of admittance

E – estimation of final control(examination by discipline)

The final rating is 60% rating of admittance and 40% marks of final control.

CHECKLISTS

for receiving the second phase of the exam on practical skills the discipline " Assessment of health risk from chemical pollution of the environment"

№ п/п	Criteria for evaluation	Level
Perfekt	Acceptable	Requires correction	Unaccept ble
1.	Conformity of the actions resulting job		7, 5
2.	Level of orientation in the action performed		7, 5
3.	Selection of the necessary equipment		7, 5
4.	Compliance with the sequence of actions		7, 5
5.	Confidence actions and movements		7, 5
6.	Clarity commenting on the move of the job		7, 5
7.	The general culture of speech. Use of professional vocabulary in the course of the assignment		7, 5
8.	Ability to use of regulatory and legislative documents		7, 5
9.	Ability to develop a plan of sanitary measures to prevent adverse environmental impacts		7, 5
10.	Ability to answer the questions of the examiner in the course of the assignment		7, 5
	Total points

Recommended literature

Basic:

1. Kenesaryiev U.I., Balmakhaeva R.M., Bekmagambetova Zh.D., Zhakashov N.Zh., Toguzbayeva K.K.. Hygiene: Textbook for institutions of higher learning / Under printing U.I. Kenesaryiev. – Almaty: «Самара-Принт», 2009. - 688 p.

2. Тulebayev R.К., Slazhneva Т.I., Kenesaryiev U.I., Belonog А.А., Korchevskii А.А. An estimation of hygienical risks is in the industrial regions Republic of Kazakhstan. – Almaty: Искандер, 2004. – 374 p.

3. Kenesaryiev U.I., Zhakashov N.Zh. Ecology and human health: Textbook for medical Institutions of higher learning and colleges. Almaty. 2002.- 260 p.

Additional:

1. Guidance for Human Health Risk Assessment at influence of chemicals contaminating an environment (Р 2.1.10.1920-04), it is ratified by the Main state health-officer RF 05.03.2004 (Guidelines for Human Health Risk Assessment from Environmental Chemicals).

2. Onishenko G.G., Novikov S.М., Rachmanin Y.А., Avaliani S.L., Bushtueva K.А. Bases of risk estimation for the health of population at influence of chemicals contaminating an environment / Under printing Rachmanin Y.А., Onishenko G.G. М.: SRI EH and GE, 2002. - 408 p.

3. Avaliani S.L., Revich B.А., Balter B.М., Gildenskiold S.R., Mishina А.L., Kliushina E.G. Estimation of risk of contamination of environment for the health of population as an instrument of municipal ecological politics is in the Moscow area. Podolsk, 2010. - 309 p.

4. Hygiene /Under printing acad. of RАМS G.I. Rumyancev. - М.: ГЭОТАР МЕДИЦИНА, 2000.-608p.

5. Law of Republic of Kazakhstan: " About a health of people of Republic of Kazakhstan" care, " About sanitary-epidemiology prosperity population of Republic of Kazakhstan". 2007.

 

 

Syllabus

By elective cycle (basic discipline)

«Risk Assessment to the Human Health From chemical contamination of environment objects»

For speciality 051102 – Public Health

 

Practical

employments: 45 hours

 

Students self-educating

Under tutor leading (SSTL) 21 hours

 

Out audience students self-educating

work (SSW): 69 hours

 

Total hours: 3 credits 135 hours

 

Control form: examination

 

Course: 4 Semester: 7-8

 

 

Almaty, 2015

Syllabus worked out in accordance with the Executable code " Risk Assessment to the Human Health from chemical contamination of environment objects", for speciality 051102 «Public Health» by associate professor Kenesariev U.I., professorsAmrin М.К., Dosmukhametov А.Т., senior tutor Erzhanonova А.Е.

 

discussed on meeting of department General Hygiene and Ecology

from «____»_______2015 Protocol №________

 

­­­­­­­­­­­­­

 

 

Head of department.

doctor of medicine, Professor U.I. Kenesaryiev

 

­­­­

 

GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 The name of Institution of Higher Learning: Kazakh National Medical University named after S.D. Asfendiyarov

1.2 Department: The General Hygiene and Ecology

1.3 Discipline: «Risk Assessment to the Human Health From chemical contamination of environment objects»

1.4 Speciality: 051102– «Public Health»

1.5 Amount of educational hours\credits: 90 hours\2 credits.

1.6 Course and semester of study: 4 course, 7-8 semester

1.7 Information about tutors

 

№ п/п	Last name, first name	Graduate degree, position, rank	Priority scientific interests	Achievements, works
1.	Kenessaryiev U.I.	Doctor of medicine, professor	Researches of the environment and human health at the oil and gas regions and nuclear test area base of Republic, realization of actual international programs.	Developer of the model programs for Republical Medical Universities of Higher Learning by the General Hygiene and Ecology, author more than 300 scientific works, including coauthor of textbooks: “Ecology and Population Health”, “Communal Hygiene”, “Hygiene” and train aid: “Hygiene of Nutrition”, “Radiation Hygiene” on official and Russian languages. Gives lectures by General Hygiene and Ecology on official and Russian languages for the students of all specialities.
2.	Amrin М.К.	Candidate of medicine, Associate professor	Researches of environment and health of population in oil and gas and nuclear-rocket test area base.	Developer of executable codes by medical ecology for medical-prophylactic, pharmaceutical faculties. An author is more than 50 scientific works, including train aid “Hygiene of Air Environment” on official and Russian languages. Gives lectures by the General Hygiene and Ecology in official language. GSD DPE “Russian Medical Academy of Postdiploma Formation” of Russian Health by course “Social-hygienic Monitoring and Human Health Risk Assessment”.
3.	Dosmukhametov А.Т.	Candidate of medicine, Associate professor	Researches of environment and health population, human health risk assessment.	Engages in the problems of environment and health of population. Gives lectures and conducts practical employments on a general hygiene and ecology. An author is the more than 40 advanced studies. Passed educating in GED DPE " Russian medical academy of Postdiploma formation" of Russian Health on a cycle " Socially-hygienical monitoring and risk estimation to the health of population"

1.8 Contact information:

Department of General Hygiene and Ecology, KazNMU Tole-Bi st.94, Tabula 1

tel. 2926722

fax 2926722

Discipline policy

A student must execute the next requirements of department:

- do not be late to the subjects; 3 delays are equated with a 1 admission on valid reason.

- not to skip employment and lecture without good reason;

- admissions of lectures are not worked off, but an estimation goes down on a 1 point on border control on a division on that given lectures, and additional questions are brought in at handing over of examination.

- to work off the skipped employments in the set time appointed by a teacher; at the ill-timed working off employments an estimation goes down on 25%.

- actively to participate in an educational process;

- to execute all tasks of practical employments and design according to requirements;

- to execute tasks on SSW and SSTL at sufficient level and to hand over them in a timely manner; at the ill-timed handing over an estimation goes down on 25%.

- to hand over all border controls in good time, without what admitting to examination holds own, and for the ill-timed handing over rating goes down on every border control on a 1 point.

- to be in an audience in white dressing-gowns.

 

Programm

Introduction.

Priority direction of modern civilization in area of safety and stability of development of society not only an exposure potentially of dangerous for a health factors of environment but also development of strategy of removal or decline of threat is to the health of population. Presently similar approach is realized in methodology of the risk estimation used practically in entire countries and international organizations.

 

2.2 Aim of discipline: Forming of knowledge and skills as evaluated by risks to the health of population from dumping of chemical.

 

2.3 Tasks of educating:

- it is forming of ideas about the factors of environment;

- it is forming of ideas about the basic indexes of health of population;

- it is forming of legal knowledge on the guard of environment and health of population;

- it is forming of knowledge on conception of risk estimation;

- it is forming of skills on methodology of estimation of risks;

- it is forming of skills on interpretation of results of risk estimation.

2.4 End-point of educating:

Forming for the students of knowledge:

- About conception of risk estimation;

- About the stages of risk estimation;

- About hazards Identification;

- About the estimation of dependence " dose-response";

- About the estimation of exposure;

- About characterization of risk for the health of population.

Forming for the students of skills:

- Independent work with normative and certificate literature on questions of guard of environment and modern methods of their research;

- to Give a risk estimation to the health of population from chemical contamination of objects of environment;

- to Use knowledge for development of measures on warning of diseases, increase of literacy of population, propaganda of nature protection measures of objects of environment.

⇐ Предыдущая123456789Следующая ⇒

Поделиться:

Популярное:

1. General linguistics. An introductory survey
2. Problem of criteria and classification of Phraseological units.
3. Synonymy. Problems of classification of synonyms (criteria, types of classification)
4. Подсчет груза по осадке судна (Draught Survey).