Архитектура Аудит Военная наука Иностранные языки Медицина Металлургия Метрология
Образование Политология Производство Психология Стандартизация Технологии


Reading 2: Types of legal profession in the USA



 

Pre-reading task. Read the words. Mind the stress. A):

΄leeway                  e΄xecutive              par΄ticipant

΄veto                    nomi΄nation           ,perso΄nnel

΄bailiff               dis΄pose                 ,evi΄dentiary

΄edit                       con΄viction            ,misde΄meanor

΄motion                  con΄sent                 ,employ΄ee

΄docket                  main΄tain               ,memo΄randum

΄adjunct                 a΄ppellate               ,dispo΄sition

΄educator               trun΄cated              e,limi΄nation

΄license                  o΄pinion                 ste΄nographer

΄entity                    a΄rray                     ,inter΄mediate

 

B) Complete the word building table.

Noun/Verb          Adjective Verb                 Noun
                             executive                             nomination
                             appellate to dispose
                             evidentiary                             conviction
nomination to maintain
justice to edit
elimination to assign

C)

Noun / verb      Person Noun / adjective Person
                        participant conviction
nomination                          educator
to assign                             commission
to edit                         stenographer
to type appellate

D) Look through the following words to make sure that you know them, learn those you don’t.

 

executive [ ] executive power executive discretion executive department   the executive head of the nation виконавчий виконавча влада; Am. урядовий; президентський; компетенція президента міністерство, відомство; відділ адміністрації окремих штатів глава виконавчої влади, глава уряду; глава держави
nomination [ ]   to place / put smb in nomination  to accept a nomination to reject a nomination a nomination to a committee 1. виставляння, висування кандидатів (на виборах, для призначення на посаду); 2. призначення (на посаду); призначити когось на посаду; прийняти пропозицію про вступ на посаду; відмовитися від посади; призначення в комітет
leeway [ ] свобода дій; додатковий час; відстрочка;
participant [ ] учасник
veto [ ] to put / set a veto on smth. to sustain a veto to override a veto 1. вето; 2. заборона; накладати вето на щось; підтвердити заборону; подолати вето
court of last resort суд останньої інстанції;
justice [ ] Chief Justice 1. суддя; 2. справедливість; 3. правосуддя голова суду
appellate [ ] appellate court апеляційний; апеляційний суд
trial court суд першої інстанції
to dispose (of) [ ] розглядати, вирішувати (справи)
evidentiary [ ] доказовий, який має значення доказу
to challenge [ ] заперечувати (проти чого-небудь у процесі)
conviction [ ] conviction on a charge conviction on indictment to seek conviction to suffer conviction to support conviction to sustain conviction  визнання підсудного винним; судимість; засудження; засудження за звинуваченням в злочині;   засудження за злочин на підставі обвинувального акту; домагатися засудження; бути засудженим; отримати чи мати судимість; 1. обґрунтувати засудження; 2. підтримати засудження; підтримати засудження (в апеляційній інстанції)
misdemeanor [ ] проступок, незначний злочин;
to consent [ ] to consent to a proposal погоджуватися, давати згоду; дозволяти, давати дозвіл; прийняти пропозицію
law clerk помічник судді;
employee [ ] робітник; службовець; той, хто працює по найму
prior [ ]   prior to 1. колишній; попередній; 2. більш важливий; першочерговий до, перед, раніше
to maintain [ ] to maintain order зберігати, утримувати; підтримувати, захищати; підтримувати порядок
chore [ ] рутинна робота, повсякденна робота;
to edit [ ] редагувати; готувати до друку; бути редактором
elbow [ ] at one’s elbow лікоть; під рукою, поруч
opinion [ ] dissenting opinion судове рішення, висновок спеціаліста; оцінка; думка; особлива думка (судді)
sounding board відбивач звуку, резонатор;
motion [ ]   клопотання, прохання; пропозиція;
docket [ ]   книга записів по справі, досьє судочинства; виписка рішення справи; список справ для слухання; 
trial adjunct [ ] судовий помічник;
judge’s chamber [ ] кабінет судді;
to handle [ ]   to handle legal matter керувати, справлятися; займатися; розбирати, обговорювати; вести (справу); мати справу (з чимось); розбирати, розглядати судову справу
staff attorney юристи, які входять в штат суду
memorandum (pl. memoranda) [ ] службова записка, меморандум, директива;
to assign [ ]   to assign counsel to the defendant 1. призначати (строк); визначати, встановлювати (межу); 2. призначати на посаду, штатну; 3. приписувати призначати адвоката обвинуваченому
disposition [ ] 1. розміщення аргументів в правильному, логічному, розумному порядку; 2. розпорядження, (pl.) плани, приготування; 3. відмова від майна;
screening [ ] to do the screening відсів, фільтрація, (ретельна) перевірка; робити перевірку
truncated [ ] скорочений, спрощений;
elimination [ ]   1. видалення; виключення; викидання; відсівання; 2. усунення; знищення, ліквідація
pleading [ ]   to file pleadings 1. захист, виступати в суді в ролі адвоката; 2. заява, яка подається в суд (якими обмінюються сторони під час процесу); 3. судові дебати (формальна сторона судового процесу); 4. подання заяви в суд; надати підстави позову чи заперечення проти позову
educator [ ] викладач, педагог;
personnel [ ] персонал, штат; кадри
bailiff [ ]   бейліф, судовий пристав; заступник шерифа; судовий виконавець
loosely [ ] широко; вільно
to license [ ] давати дозвіл, право, патент;
entity [ ] international entity legal entity суб'єкт, особа; організм суб'єкт міжнародних відносин юридична особа
prosecuting attorney державний обвинувач, прокурор;
house counsel юрисконсульт /радник / рада, що працює в компанії
array [ ] array of problems сукупність, маса; маса проблем

 

1. Read the text and translate the text into Ukrainian.

 

       Judges

Judges in the USA initially come to the bench from other lines of legal work and after a substantial number of years of professional experience. American judges differ from judges of the common-law countries and civil-law systems in other parts of the world. Many judges have been legislators, but some have been office lawyers or counsel to organizations such as corporations or private associations. Numerous judges have been lawyers in government service as prosecuting attorneys or counsel to government agencies, either state or federal. Some judges are former law professors, but their number is small. Persons can enter the judicial system at any level. A lawyer can initially become a judge on the highest court, the lowest court, or any court between. In other words, a lawyer who has never been a judge can become a judge on a court of last resort or an intermediate appellate court or a trial court, in either a state or the federal system. Lawyers who come on the bench at the trial or intermediate appellate levels have no real promise of moving to a higher court.

Federal magistrate judges perform two kinds of functions. First, they hold hearings on variety of motions, such as motions seeking to control lawyers’ conduct of discovery in civil cases, and make recommendations to the district judge as to the disposition. Assistance of this sort enables district judges to dispose of these matters without having to sit to conduct hearings themselves; they can simply accept the magistrates’ recommendations. Magistrate judges also hold evidentiary hearing on prisoner’s petitions challenging the legality of their convictions, and they recommend factual findings to the judge. Second, magistrate judges are authorized to conduct trials in civil cases and in criminal misdemeanor cases if the parties consent. In other words, the parties can choose to go to trial before a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. If the parties exercise this opinion, the magistrate judge is empowered to decide the case and enter final judgment in the name of the district court.

The Attorney General

The federal system is the best known example of executive nomination with legislative confirmation. The Attorney General of the United States and the Department of Justice, which he heads, are key executive branch participants in the selection process, along with the White House staff. In selecting Supreme Court nominees, the President has even more leeway, but he still must take into account sentiment in the Senate, as that body has in effect a veto over the nomination.

 

       Law Clerks

In the common-law tradition and in American practice prior to the twentieth century, judges functioned without assistance in judicial decision making. There has always been a clerk of the court, a court employee who handles the papers and maintains case files. Judges also have long had secretarial help for typing and other clerical chores.

A law clerk is usually a recent law school graduate. Most clerks have strong academic records in law school. Many appellate judges require experience on a student-edited law school journal. Typically a clerk serves one year, although some serve two. There are few career clerks. The law clerks, sometimes called ‘elbow clerks’, is a personal assistant to the judge. In general clerks do legal research, prepare memoranda on the cases, summarizing facts and issues and giving the clerk’s analysis, edit drafts of opinions written by the judge, and serve as a sounding board and discussion partner for the judge. Work as a clerk is considered an excellent professional experience for a new law school graduate, a year long transition from the academic to the ‘real’ world, with an opportunity to see the workings of the judicial process from the inside.

The work of law clerks in trial courts differ somewhat from that of law clerks in appellate courts. Appellate clerks spend much time in editing, and sometimes drafting, opinions that their judges are assigned to prepare for the court. Trial clerks also draft some memoranda and short opinions, but in addition they assist the judge with motions of all sorts and in pretrial conferences and hearings. They often deal with parties’ lawyers to assist the judge in managing his docket. To a considerable extent these different duties reflect the difference between the work of a trial court and that of appellate court.

Staff attorneys

The distinction between staff attorneys and law clerks in that the latter work for an individual judge in that judge’s chambers; the relationship is direct and personal, with the clerk responsible to no one except that judge. Central staff attorneys, on the other hand, work for the court as a whole. Central staff in appellate courts writes memoranda on cases for the use of the judges to whom those cases are assigned. In some courts they also draft proposed dispositions, usually short opinions in cases with issues that are not especially difficult or novel. Central staff attorneys often do the screening, a process of identifying those appeals that can appropriately be decided through truncated processes, usually involving the elimination of oral argument.

Adjuncts

In many state trail courts there are adjuncts variously entitled commissioners, referees, and part-time judges. In some state appellate courts there are commissioners who assist the court much as staff attorneys do.

Clerks of the court

Every court, whether trial or appellate, state or federal, has a clerk of the court who has a staff. The clerk’s office is the place where lawyers and litigants file pleadings, motions, and other papers in the cases brought in the court. The clerk’s office keeps a file on each case and maintains the docket book and the official record of the court’s actions in all of its cases. All matters that come before the judges flow first through the clerk’s office.

Judicial educator

The newest type of administrative official, now found in every state judicial system, is the state judicial educator. This officer, who usually works under the direction of the state chief justice or a judicial council of some sort, is responsible for planning and carrying out programs of continuing education for the state’s judges and other court personnel. In most states such educational undertakings are offered for judges at all levels, most commonly for trail judges of the general and limited jurisdiction courts.


Поделиться:



Последнее изменение этой страницы: 2019-04-10; Просмотров: 317; Нарушение авторского права страницы


lektsia.com 2007 - 2024 год. Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав! (0.017 с.)
Главная | Случайная страница | Обратная связь