Estimation of formed of competenses
№
| Theme
| Valuable competences
|
Knowledge
| Practical skills
| Communicative skills
| Legal competence
| Self-education
|
| Bases of methodology Risk Assessment are in the system of the socially-hygienical monitoring
| Verbal questioning by questions.
Decision of test tasks
|
|
| Knowledge of Law of RK " About sanitary-epidemiological prosperity of population"
|
|
| Stages of risk assessment.
| Verbal questioning on questions.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
|
| Knowledge of Order №117 from 28.12.2007. It is ratified by Committee of state sanitary-epidemiological supervision
|
|
| Hazard identification of chemical pollution of air. Identification the hazards of chemicals on toxicological properties. Methods of identification of priority substances.
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Assessment of dependence " dose/concentration-response" (air pollution).
| Verbal questioning.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Exposure assessment of air pollutants.
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Risk characterization. Assessment of uncertainties
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Assessment of exposure
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Hazard identification of chemical pollution of water. Identification the hazards of chemicals on toxicological properties. Methods of identification of priority substances.
| Testing.
Verbal questioning.
|
|
|
|
|
| Exposure assessment of water pollutants.
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Risk characterization. Assessment of uncertainties
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Hazard identification of chemical pollution of food. Identification the hazards of chemicals on toxicological properties. Methods of identification of priority substances.
| Verbal questioning.
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Exposure assessment of food pollutants.
| Testing.
Verbal questioning.
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Risk characterization. Assessment of uncertainties
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Risk management. Definition. World experience.
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
|
|
|
|
| Risk management. Calculation of economic damage.
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situational tasks
| Works in a small group
| Knowledge of Decision of Government of RK №93 from January, 17, 2012
| Work with scientific literature on the internet
|
· Self-educated competence is estimated at the reception of SSW according to the presented list that SSW in an executable code and syllabus.
· Student must hand over for 2 SSW. The theme of SSW gets out a student independently.
Checking of educational achievements of student system:
Current control:
Practical employments: verbal questioning
- testing - in writing by variants;
- verification of implementation of tasks on independent work - in a written or oral form.
SSW: defend of presentation, estimation of drafting and decision of case-study, tests, cross-words, self-control on results testing
Border control: colloquium as testing and verbal questioning.
Current control:
Practical employment, border control, SSW – maximum 100 points
Traditional evaluation
| Criterion
| Points
|
«А» 4
| Presence, complete answer at the verbal questioning, testing 95-100%, implementation of all tasks
| 95-100 p.
|
«А-» 3, 67
| Presence, at questioning insignificant errors, testing 90-94%, inexact implementation of tasks
| 90-94 p.
|
«В » 3, 33
| Presence, at questioning insignificant errors, testing 85-89%
| 85-89 p.
|
«В» 3, 0
| Presence, at questioning fundamental errors, testing 80-84%
| 80-84 p.
|
«В-» 2, 67
| Presence, at questioning fundamental errors, testing 75-79%, incomplete implementation of tasks
| 75-79 p.
|
«С » 2, 33
| Presence, at questioning fundamental errors, testing 70-74%
| 70-74 p.
|
«С» 2, 0
| Presence, testing 65-69% at questioning fundamental errors, incomplete implementation of tasks
| 65-69 p.
|
«С-» 1, 67
| Presence, testing 60-64% at questioning fundamental errors, incomplete implementation of tasks
| 60-64 p.
|
«D » 1, 33
| Presence, testing 55-59%, at questioning fundamental errors, not implementation of tasks
| 55-59 p.
|
«D-» 1, 0
| Presence, at questioning fundamental errors, testing 50-54%, not implementation of tasks
| 50-54 p.
|
«F» 0
| Presence, ignorance of material, not implementation of tasks
| 0-49 p.
|
| Absence on employment
| 0 p.
|
Current control t – evaluation of level formed competences
t= Z N K P S/n, that n – amount of tasks on all competences
1.1. Knowledge Z: z1 z2 … zn
1.2. Skills N: n1 n2 … nn
1.3. Communicative competence K: k1 k2 … kn
1.4. Legal competence P: p1 p2 … pn
1.5. Self-education (СРС) S: s1 s2 … sn
Every competence is evaluated on a 100-ball scale, form of estimation, amount of tasks on every competence is determined the in the Executable code (ch.2.9 Methods of estimation of knowledge and of skills of student) and Syllabus (ch.2.10 Criteria and rules of estimation of knowledge).
Border control r - amount, the form of realization is determined by politics of discipline.
Raring of admittance the end estimation of student is not less than 60 %, following formula
Rд=
That r1 – first rating, r2 – second rating, t – current control
Checklists
First name and surname of the student _____________________________________
Популярное: