The current control t – assessment of the level of formation of competencies
t= (Z+N+K+P+S)/n
that
n – amount of tasks on all competencies
Z: z1+z2+…+zn - Estimates for the knowledge
N: n1+n2+…+nn - Estimates for skills
K: k1+k2+…+kn - Estimates for communicative competence
P: p1+p2+…+pn - Estimates for the legal competence
S: s1+ s2+…+sn - Estimates for SSW
The final grade
The final grade is composed of tolerance rating and evaluation of the final control:
I = R х 0, 6 + Е1 × 0, 15 +Е2 0, 20
that
I - final grade
R - rated assessment of tolerance
E - evaluation of final control (examination of the discipline)
The final rating is 60% of the rating of admission and 40% of the final assessment of control.
The examination - 60% mark for the test and 40% for the second phase of the exam
Rating exam
E = E1 × 0, 25 + E2 × 0, 15
that
E1 - points for stage I exam,
E2 - points for stage II exam.
Estimation of formed of competenses
№
| Виды работ
| Theme of employment
| Valuable competences
|
Knowledge
| Practical skills
| Communicative skills
| Legal competence
| Self-education
|
1.
| Practical employment
| Bases of methodology of risk estimation are in the system of the socially-hygienical monitoring.
| Verbal questioning by questions.
Decision of test tasks
|
| Works in a small group
| Knowledge of Law of RK " About sanitary-epidemiological prosperity of population"
|
|
2.
| Practical employment
| Bases of methodology of risk estimation are in the system of the socially-hygienical monitoring.
| Verbal questioning by questions.
Decision of test tasks
|
|
|
|
|
3.
| Practical employment
| Hazards Identification. Aim. Determination of preliminary scenario and routes of influence. Selection of priority substances.
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situatioonal tasks
|
| №117 order dated 28.12.2007. Approved by the State Committee Sanepid supervision
|
|
4.
| Practical employment
| Hazards Identification. Aim. Determination of preliminary scenario and routes of influence. Selection of priority substances.
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situatioonal tasks
|
|
|
|
5.
| Practical employment
| Hazards Identification. Aim. Determination of preliminary scenario and routes of influence. Selection of priority substances.
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situatioonal tasks
|
|
| Work with scientific literature on the internet
|
6.
| Practical employment
| Assessment of dependence " dose/concentration-response
| Verbal questioning.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situatioonal tasks
|
|
|
|
7.
| Practical employment
| Assessment of dependence " dose/concentration-response
| Verbal questioning.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situatioonal tasks
|
|
|
|
8.
| Practical employment
| Exposure assessment.
| Verbal questioning.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situatioonal tasks
|
|
|
|
9.
| Practical employment
| Exposure assessment.
| Verbal questioning.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situatioonal tasks
|
|
|
|
10.
| Practical employment
| Risk characterization. Estimation of uncertainties.
| Verbal questioning.
Testing.
Analysis of case-study
| Decision of situatioonal tasks
|
| Knowledge of Decision of Government of RK №93 from January, 17, 2012
| Work with scientific literature on the internet
|
· Self-educated competence is estimated at the reception of SSW according to the presented list that SSW in an executable code and силлабусе.
· Student must hand over for 2 SSW. The theme of SSW gets out a student independently.
Checklists
First name and surname of the student _____________________________________
Criteria for evaluation oral (written) survey
№
|
Criteria for evaluation
| Level
|
Perfekt
| Acceptable
| Requires correction
| Unaccept ble
|
1.
| Level of understanding of the topic
|
| 11.25
| 7, 5
|
|
2.
| The ability to think logically
|
| 11, 25
| 7, 5
|
|
3.
| Match of the material issues raised
|
|
|
|
|
4.
| Availability to answer all the necessary theoretical facts
|
| 7, 5
| 5, 0
|
|
5.
| Illustration answer correctly-chosen examples
|
| 7, 5
| 5, 0
|
|
6.
| Culture of Speech
|
| 7, 5
| 5, 0
|
|
7.
| Possession of professional terminology
|
| 7, 5
| 5, 0
|
|
8.
| Ability to make valid conclusions
|
| 7, 5
| 5, 0
|
|
| Total
|
|
|
|
|
Total maximum score - 100
CHECKLISTS
First name and surname of the student _____________________________________
Criteria for evaluation communication skills of the student
№
|
Criteria for evaluation
| Level
|
Perfekt
| Acceptable
| Requires correction
| Unaccept ble
|
1.
| Skill self-representation
|
| 11, 25
| 7, 5
|
|
2.
| Active listening skills
|
| 11, 25
| 7, 5
|
|
3.
| Skill accurate and specific information transfer
|
| 11, 25
| 7, 5
|
|
4.
| Skill to express their point of view, its position
|
| 11, 25
| 7, 5
|
|
5.
| Skill reasoned speech
|
| 11, 25
| 7, 5
|
|
6.
| Skill manifestations of participation and interest in the partner
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
7.
| Skill of understanding the emotional state of the communication partner
| 7, 5
| 5, 62
| 3, 75
|
|
8.
| Skill beliefs partner
| 7, 5
| 5, 62
| 3, 75
|
|
| Total
|
|
|
|
|
Total maximum score - 100
CHECKLISTS
First name and surname of the student _____________________________________
Criteria for evaluation the presentation in multimedia format
№
|
Criteria for evaluation
| Level
|
Perfekt
| Acceptable
| Requires correction
| Unaccept ble
|
1.
| Any title slide with the headline, plan presentation, a sufficient number of slides, list of references and sources of Internet.
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
2.
| The contents of the presentation of the topic and the task.
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
3.
| Location slides in a logical sequence.
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
4.
| The style of presentation (conciseness, clear formulation, structuring).
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
5.
| The use of modern information sources in sufficient quantities.
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
6.
| Ability to generalize the material, clear and precise conclusions.
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
7.
| Level of orientation in the material presentation.
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
8.
| The ability to report accurately, correctly, consistently.
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
9.
| Ability to defend its position and the ability to respond constructively to criticism.
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
10.
| Quality design slides (brilliance, clarity, etc.).
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
| Total
|
|
|
|
|
Total maximum score - 100
CHECKLISTS
First name and surname of the student _____________________________________
Criteria for evaluation of the abstract
№
|
Criteria for evaluation
| Level
|
Perfekt
| Acceptable
| Requires correction
| Unaccept ble
|
1.
| The contents of the essay topic, essay plan and assigned tasks
|
| 9, 75
| 6, 5
|
|
2.
| Completeness and consistency of disclosure topics
|
| 9, 75
| 6, 5
|
|
3.
| Ability to summarize and draw conclusions
|
| 9, 75
| 6, 5
|
|
4.
| The ability to work with sources of information
|
| 9, 75
| 6, 5
|
|
5.
| Ability to respond to questions on the abstract
|
|
|
|
|
6.
| Compliance with the requirements of the Department of the abstract design.
|
|
|
|
|
7.
| The quality and completeness of the illustrations.
|
|
|
|
|
8.
| Selection of literature
|
|
|
|
|
| Total
|
|
|
|
|
Total maximum score - 100
CHECKLISTS
First name and surname of the student _____________________________________
Criteria for assessment of the thematic crossword
№
|
Criteria for evaluation
| Level
|
Perfekt
| Acceptable
| Requires correction
| Unaccept ble
|
1.
| The contents of the selected theme crossword
|
|
|
|
|
2.
| Literacy, conciseness in drafting issues
|
|
|
|
|
3.
| The number of questions in a crossword.
|
|
|
|
|
4.
| Having a list of references
|
|
|
|
|
5.
| Aesthetically sustained clearance
|
|
|
|
|
| Total
|
|
|
|
|
Total maximum score - 100
CHECKLISTS
First name and surname of the student _____________________________________
Criteria for evaluation situational problem, a case study
№
|
Criteria for evaluation
| Level
|
Perfekt
| Acceptable
| Requires correction
| Unaccept ble
|
1.
| Number of questions to which the student replied
|
|
|
|
|
2.
| Completeness and consistency of disclosure of the issue of the problem
|
|
|
|
|
3.
| Independent selection of literature
|
|
|
|
|
4.
| Ability to work with sources of information - the standard documentation
|
|
|
|
|
5.
| Ability to summarize and draw conclusions
|
|
|
|
|
| Total
|
|
|
|
|
Total maximum score - 100
CHECKLISTS
for receiving the second phase of the exam on practical skills the discipline " Assessment of health risk from chemical pollution of the environment, " the students 4 year degree " Public Health"
№
п/п
|
Criteria for evaluation
| Level
|
Perfekt
| Acceptable
| Requires correction
| Unaccept ble
|
1.
| Conformity of the actions resulting job
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
2.
| Level of orientation in the action performed
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
3.
| Selection of the necessary equipment
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
4.
| Compliance with the sequence of actions
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
5.
| Confidence actions and movements
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
6.
| Clarity commenting on the move of the job
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
7.
| The general culture of speech. Use of professional vocabulary in the course of the assignment
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
8.
| Ability to use of regulatory and legislative documents
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
9.
| Ability to develop a plan of sanitary measures to prevent adverse environmental impacts
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
10.
| Ability to answer the questions of the examiner in the course of the assignment
|
| 7, 5
|
|
|
| Total points
|
|
Speciality: Public Health
Methodical recommendations to practical employments
Course: 4
Discipline: Human Health Risk assessment
Популярное: